About 4 weeks ago I had a chance encounter with Bruce of Albatross marine on the jetty. Bruce
had introduced himself months earlier and several times told me of the
boat services that he offered. This time I asked him if he dealt with
osmosis (https://www.google.com/url?sa =t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web& cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKE wi-t_aa9PXaAhWBx7wKHX7JADYQFgg pMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mysa iling.com.au%2Fcruising%2Fthe- scourge-of-fibreglass-tackling -osmosis&usg=AOvVaw3Yc4x25LVpy bV_nJ_f2tD4),
a potentially serious problem in older fibreglass hulls where water
breaches the gecoat (outer coat), works its way into the fiberglass and a
chemical reaction ensues and round blisters appear on the hull below
the waterline. Left untreated the osmosis would work deeper into the
fibreglass eventually threatening the integrity of the hull.
I
had noticed the bumps on the hull during the last maintenance haulout,
photographed them, drawn a rough sketch of them, but did nothing about
them immediately because the sailing season was ahead.
Bruce
replied that he did deal with osmosis, so I asked him when was the best
time to treat it, expecting him to reply that the high summer was the
best time because the heat and low humidity would help dry the hull
quickly. To my surprise his reply was "now". He explained that he
could either deal with it now, before the heavy rains of July-Aug
arrived, or in the spring.
Given
that I had freed up my winter months by postponing my trip to the USA
due to my rental property problems I decided to proceed now to get the
project out of the way during this winter time of low demand for the
club's hardstand services, not to mention the services of marine
specialists.
I
did this knowing that it would put a temporary strain on both my time
& energy and finances. However, I knew that I had one thing going
for me: this is the best time of the year for me health wise. In the
spring and early summer I am a different person, with low energy &
stamina, particularly if I have been through a heavy influenza
infection.
Bruce and I had a meeting on Pachuca about a week ago and discussed the scope and time line of the project. Bruce
could not give a firm quotation because he would not know the extent of
the problem until the boat was out of the water. In order to do the
work the boat would have to be moved into a paint bay to be fully
protected from the weather. Any money saved by working outdoors would
be lost by delays due to adverse wind and rains. In order to move the
boat into the bay the mast would have to be removed (double gulp!).
"OK, Bruce,
do you paint hulls too?" Indeed he does, showing me the excellent
work that his very experienced painter had done on his own boat, which
was on the hardstand. So given that the boat would be in the paint bay
it made sense to paint the hull. This would help me fulfill a promise
that I had made to Pachuca that I would shout her (Australian for
"provide her with") a new paint job if she got me back to Australia
alive. (Bruce declared that sentiment "cute" with a tap on my arm.)
Bruce mentioned that the mast could be stored in the paint bay next to Pachuca, sparing me the cost of storing the mast in the hardstand area. But wait a minute! If Pachuca is in the paint bay and the spray painter is painting her hull, why not also paint her mast while everything was set and geared up? So we are going the Full Monte (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /The_Full_Monty) and treating the osmosis, repainting the hull, and repainting the mast.
Bruce mentioned that the mast could be stored in the paint bay next to Pachuca, sparing me the cost of storing the mast in the hardstand area. But wait a minute! If Pachuca is in the paint bay and the spray painter is painting her hull, why not also paint her mast while everything was set and geared up? So we are going the Full Monte (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
But Wait, There's More! Bruce
will also repaint the non-skid parts of the foredeck, first removing
two redundant spinnaker fittings (I don't do spinnakers any more.) and
removing two bolts that formally held the old radar unit and are
bleeding rust onto the deck.
Some people call it mission creep. I call it synergy.
Bruce
volunteered that boats of my vintage can expect the advent of osmosis
after about 30 years. Pachuca was built in 1983, about 35 years ago.
"You mean that it was inevitable, not my fault, and I don't have to
feel guilty?" Bruce must have thought that charming because he put his hand on my arm and assured me that no, it was not my fault.
We agreed that the job would be done.
At Works Jetty between Trevor's boat and the rocks |
The first task was to put the sum of $10,000 into the Albatross Marine trust account (gulp!). Bruce could not give a firm quotation because he would not know the extent of the problem until the boat was out of the water and the hull scrapped off. All he could offer was his hourly rate. In the end, as in many endeavors in Australia, it came down to personal trust. By then I thought that I had Bruce's measure and I trust him to do the right thing.
On Saturday morning I met Bruce in order to ferry Pachuca to the works
jetty in order to put her in position for the removal of her mast. My
task was to head for the rocks lining the shoreline, do a tight left
turn, then somehow do a tight right turn and get abreast of the works jetty between Trevor's (owner of the Yacht Grot
chandlery) large boat and the rocks. Trevor had moved his boat back
along the jetty to make room for me but I commented that it had not been
enough. As we approached this tricky maneuver Bruce must have heard my fretting and seen the light and at the last moment we tied up at the end of the works
jetty the obtained the cooperation and assistance of the workmen on
Trevor's boat to manhandle the boat back probably 3 meters in order to
make more room for Pachuca.
Tired as I was from the work at the rental property (another problem) I stayed back and worked several hours isolating the mast cables from the rest of the boat, which turned out to be a more difficult job than I had anticipated for reasons that I will not explain here.
Tired as I was from the work at the rental property (another problem) I stayed back and worked several hours isolating the mast cables from the rest of the boat, which turned out to be a more difficult job than I had anticipated for reasons that I will not explain here.
I
was back at the boat at 7 AM on Monday morning to tidy up the cabin
after my efforts of Saturday and prepare for the removal of items from
the deck. Bruce arrived at 7.30 AM and we off loaded the inflatable dinghy, life raft, and boarding ladder to the works jetty and loaded them into Bruce's van.
Crane lifting the mast |
Then
there was the laborious job of dropping the mainsail, releasing about 6
lines, then removing the boom. After that we went below and spent a
difficult 45 minutes threading cables up past the mast stump into the
mast itself (I won't go into that here.) The rigger Steve arrived at
about 9 AM and began his work, which included the application of heat
and a special tool to complete the wiring removal job. At 9.30 AM John
arrived with his crane. The crane hoist was lashed to the mast and took
some of the load while Steve completed the task of freeing all of the
standing rigging. The removal of a pin to separate the mast from the
stump was a particularly challenging job.
Eventually
the mast was removed, laid on wheeled supports, then the crane
departed. The crane weighed the hull at 10.8 metric tons and the mast & rigging at 350 kg.
Liftout |
Soon we ferried the boat to the lifting bay. We had trouble
backing Pachuca out from her cramped location because every time that
went into reverse to back the boat out the stern would move back to the
jetty and in front of Trevor's boat due to Pachuca's "prop walk" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Propeller_walk). In the end Bruce
agreed that instead of pushing the stern off the jetty then trying to
back out past Trevor's boat we would push the bow off and allow the
gentle breeze to swing the bow around. In the end we (I, actually)
managed to do a 180 degree turn in a tight confine using short bursts
forward then short bursts back to let the prop walk swing the boat to
the right.
Soon
we were in the lifting pen, the boat was lifted out, hull cleaned off
with the powerful spray, then placed into the sheltered painting bay.
At the spray bay the man sprayed through some of the "osmosis" bulbs and
found that they represented only a separation of anti fouling from the
hull and underneath was solid and undamaged fiberglass. Bruce stated that there was nevertheless indeed osmosis on the hull but volunteered that it is not very bad. I will know more once Bruce had stripped the hull clean.
In the shed, mast by her side |
But
all was not finished on that day. Before retiring for some R&R I
fulfilled my commitment to lift all of the cabin floorboards to
facilitate the drying of the hull (aided by de-humidifiers that Bruce will run), remove all of the canvas work, and clear the decks and cockpit of all ropes and gear possible.
Regarding the boat, I think that I am "over the hump" as far as my time and energy is concerned. Bruce
uttered a monologue about how from now on he would do his thing and I
would do my thing, visiting the boat and feeling free to ask
questions. "OK, I get your message. In fact, Bruce,
my style is to back off, allow professionals to do their thing, and not
to stand over them scrutinizing everything that they do." Bruce's response was a warm smile and a firm handshake.
That
means that other than the frequent visit to see how things are going I
have no "hands on" obligations to the restoration of Pachuca and can
focus my efforts to the rental property problem. In short, I think that
I am Over The Hump. (Sigh!)
No comments:
Post a Comment